Decree on the Swiss currency and cash supply
Official title: Bundesbeschluss über die schweizerische Währung und die Bargeldversorgung
The counter-proposal wants to state in the Federal Constitution that the Swiss National Bank ensures the supply of cash and that the franc is Switzerland's currency.
This summary was written by an AI from the official documents; a second AI checked it sentence by sentence. How we use AI
Result: Accepted
73.4% yes
- Cantons: 23 for, 0 against
- Turnout 55.4%
Source: Federal Statistical Office (FSO)
Yes or no?
What changes if YES wins?
A yes means the Constitution now states that the Swiss National Bank ensures the supply of cash and that the franc is the Swiss currency.
What changes if NO wins?
A no means the counter-proposal does not come into force. The two rules stay in the law, as today.
At a glance
- Type of proposal
- Direct counter-proposal
- Needed to pass
- A majority of voters and of the cantons
- Federal Council recommends
- Yes
What exactly is it about?
In Switzerland, people increasingly pay without cash, for example with cards or payment apps. According to a National Bank survey from 2024, 95 percent of the population want cash to remain available as a means of payment. Today the law states that the Swiss National Bank ensures the supply of cash and that the franc is Switzerland's currency. The popular initiative «Cash is Freedom» wants to anchor these points in the Constitution, using its own wording. The Federal Council and Parliament disagree with that wording and set against it a direct counter-proposal, the decree on the Swiss currency and cash supply. It takes over two existing legal provisions largely unchanged into the Constitution. According to the Federal Council, the counter-proposal has no practical effects: it creates no new tasks and no additional costs, and no right to pay in cash. The provisions could however only be changed with a majority of the people and the cantons. The initiative and the counter-proposal are voted on separately, with a tie-breaker question in case both are accepted.
What is disputed?
The Federal Council and Parliament recommend a yes. They argue that the counter-proposal strengthens the legal standing of cash and the franc and takes up the initiative's legitimate concerns. It adopts proven, legally clear wording from existing laws and leaves out unnecessary provisions. A minority in Parliament recommends a no. Some members of the National Council consider the counter-proposal, like the initiative, unnecessary because the current legal situation is sufficient. The initiative committee, which supports the initiative, also criticises the counter-proposal: the term «cash» is imprecise and could also mean digital central bank money. It also gives responsibility to the National Bank without obliging the Confederation.
Party recommendations
Recommend Yes
SVP Swiss People's Party
SP Social Democratic Party of Switzerland
Mitte The Centre
FDP FDP.The Liberals
GPS Green Party of Switzerland
EDU Federal Democratic Union
EVP Evangelical People's Party of Switzerland
Recommend No
GLP Green Liberal Party of Switzerland
Ordered by seats in the National Council (2023 election).
Official resources
- Bundesbeschluss über die schweizerische Währung und die Bargeldversorgung
- VoteInfo (federal)
- smartvote
Vote data: Swissvotes – Année Politique Suisse, University of Bern (CC BY 4.0), and the Federal Statistical Office.